

Save Time and Materials – Solve in 3D
With over 70,000 employees worldwide and projects in more than 40 countries, WSP is one of the world’s leading engineering consultancy firms. In Denmark, WSP works across infrastructure, construction, climate adaptation, and energy.
At WSP Ports & Marine, we spoke with Jesper Hauge Larsen and Daniel Virgilsen – engineering graduate and chief advisor, respectively – about how they work with geotechnics in Optum, and the challenges and pitfalls they’ve encountered with 2D analyses.
Together, we’ve taken a deep dive into a circular excavation pit, where inflowing groundwater posed a challenge. We explored ring effects, where 2D fell short, and investigated how 3D stress distribution calculations can save both time and materials.
Circular Excavation Pit Required 3D
When constructing a round secant pile excavation pit, WSP faced a well-known geotechnical challenge: permeable materials and inflowing groundwater. At the same time, the geometry meant that a 2D model couldn’t provide an optimal calculation.
“We had issues with inflowing groundwater because the soil included permeable sand layers. The solution was to cast a thick concrete base plug to stop the inflow,” explains Jesper.
The circular geometry of the pit created a natural ring effect – an advantageous load distribution where the pressure is evenly spread around the circumference, thereby stabilising the wall from within

“When you have a ring effect, the wall can actually be made thinner or the internal bracing reduced – thanks to the hoop stresses,” Jesper explains.
But ring effects cannot be documented in 2D, because in 2D the wall is modelled as a flat plane. This underestimates the actual strength of the structure and results in an incorrect and overly conservative calculation.
3D Calculations Optimised Material Use
In 2019, WSP was tasked with designing the back lands for the expansion of the Port of Frederikshavn. The new harbour area – 180,000 m² – needed to be dimensioned to support a crawler crane. Here, it became clear that a 2D model couldn’t provide a realistic picture of how the load was distributed through the crushed rock bearing layer.
“Due to the crawler tracks, the crane’s load is distributed through the belts and spreads diagonally into the ground – resulting in a three-dimensional distribution of pressure. We quickly realised that 2D was too conservative for modelling this accurately, since it only provides vertical slices, and the load is idealised as either a line or point load,” Daniel explains.

Using a 3D model in OPTUM G3, it became possible to get an accurate representation of the stress distribution – and when compared to the 2D results, the model revealed significant optimisation potential.
“On an area of that size, differences of 10, 20, or 30 centimetres in layer thickness mean a great deal in terms of material usage. The 3D model enabled us to find an optimal solution, where we could significantly reduce the amount of crushed rock – without compromising safety,” says Daniel.
He adds:

Spæncom Slashes Design Time with Automation in OPTUM CS

Sweco Saves Time with Optum
